lareinenoire (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
lareinenoire) wrote2007-03-04 01:55 pm
lareinenoire) wrote2007-03-04 01:55 pm
Entry tags:
Henry VIII: Rockstar?
(Apparently I'm spamming today)
I just found out -- literally about five minutes ago -- that Showtime is doing a series based on Henry VIII.
Judging from the previews it could be good, or it could be absolutely utterly horrendous. The goal for the series, it appears, is to portray a younger and more approachable Henry. Which I can certainly understand and find interesting. That being said, the screenwriter is the same man who wrote Elizabeth, which automatically puts me on my guard. Decent enough film, absolutely butchered the history.
And, of course, this being Showtime, lots of violence and general debauchery à la Rome. Not a bad thing, just an observation.
However, the series does have Jonathan Rhys-Meyers (Henry), Sam Neill (Wolsey), and Jeremy Northam (Thomas More). Plus an unknown playing Anne Boleyn who actually looks like she can pull it off (though in my mind she will need to compete with Genevieve Bujold in Anne of the Thousand Days, very difficult to do).
Apparently the Tudors are popular these days. Not surprising, given the Philippa Gregory juggernaut. Now, if only someone would wander back a few decades so they could add a chapter to my dissertation...
ETA (14:20): A number of comments on YouTube focus on how much JRM does not look like Henry VIII, as in he doesn't have red hair. I'm actually not bothered by this, since Richard Burton didn't have red hair either and he still did a very good job playing Henry VIII. I suppose it will all depend on the performance.
And is it proof of my fount of useless knowledge that I recognised every single piece of music used in the Showtime trailer?
I just found out -- literally about five minutes ago -- that Showtime is doing a series based on Henry VIII.
Judging from the previews it could be good, or it could be absolutely utterly horrendous. The goal for the series, it appears, is to portray a younger and more approachable Henry. Which I can certainly understand and find interesting. That being said, the screenwriter is the same man who wrote Elizabeth, which automatically puts me on my guard. Decent enough film, absolutely butchered the history.
And, of course, this being Showtime, lots of violence and general debauchery à la Rome. Not a bad thing, just an observation.
However, the series does have Jonathan Rhys-Meyers (Henry), Sam Neill (Wolsey), and Jeremy Northam (Thomas More). Plus an unknown playing Anne Boleyn who actually looks like she can pull it off (though in my mind she will need to compete with Genevieve Bujold in Anne of the Thousand Days, very difficult to do).
Apparently the Tudors are popular these days. Not surprising, given the Philippa Gregory juggernaut. Now, if only someone would wander back a few decades so they could add a chapter to my dissertation...
ETA (14:20): A number of comments on YouTube focus on how much JRM does not look like Henry VIII, as in he doesn't have red hair. I'm actually not bothered by this, since Richard Burton didn't have red hair either and he still did a very good job playing Henry VIII. I suppose it will all depend on the performance.
And is it proof of my fount of useless knowledge that I recognised every single piece of music used in the Showtime trailer?
no subject
no subject
no subject